1. The man was killed by the subway train, the photographer took the photo to warn the subway driver with his flash to indicate the problem.
2. He took out his camera to capture the man's final moments and to alert the subway driver.
3. No, I don't think so because instead of taking the picture he should've just helped him up out of the way, but then again both of them could've died.
4. I think he did because he tried to get the driver's attention to slow down but at least he tried to stop the subway train.
5. I disagree because people from all over the country read the New York Post, and also the people who knew the man who died might of felt anger and sad about what happened recently to him and not want to see that on every corner of New York.
6. Most of it's important because you are most likely to not do much of help, because you have to think about yourself also but you also have a job to do and make it on the newspaper to see what people or things that are happening on that picture and explain why.
7. I don't think a photographer could be ethically involved in something like a situation. Because sometimes, a photographer might not know what to do in a strong situation, it could also make the situation worse.
8. A photographer should be influenced in an event, that is why they go and take pictures to describe on why the situation is happening.
9. I think Stan Alost had the most explainable post, it has more details on why.
No comments:
Post a Comment